This page is for discussion of maintaining the node maps at:

People:

Software Maintenance

Database Maintenance

Field Verification

Issues:

Node Naming/Taxonomy

(See NodeNaming)


I think we need to figure out a systematic way to name our nodes. I feel that NYC Wireless has done a good job with this, with the nodes listed by borough. --BillHolmstrom


I agree, oddly enough, I did this sometime yesterday for my Ashland nodes and was thinking the exact same thing. --ForrestEnglish


Since the node map database already has a field for group affiliation (PTP, NYC, BAWUG, etc), and groups are generally local/regional in scope, each group should determine how to list locations within their "territory." In New York, they categorize by borough first, then generally by street location. For Portland, I suggest using N, NE, NW, SW, SE for the closer-in areas, and community names (Vancouver, Gresham, etc.) for outer areas. After that, areas with thin node populations can list the node name, while thickly populated areas may need sub-areas before the node name. I believe we should avoid using street addresses in the node name. Examples:

--BillHolmstrom


Other Issues


[CategoryCommunity] [CategoryPersonalTelco]

MapMaintenance (last edited 2012-03-09 10:28:06 by DanRasmussen)