|
← Revision 6 as of 2002-01-17 23:27:34
Size: 1390
Comment:
|
← Revision 7 as of 2002-01-17 23:30:30 →
Size: 1417
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 26: | Line 26: |
| [CategoryUnknown] |
[CategoryCommunity] [CategoryPersonalTelco] |
This page is for discussion of maintaining the node maps at http://maps.personaltelco.net/.
People:
BillHolmstrom can help sometimes
- others
Issues:
Node Naming/Taxonomy
I think we need to figure out a systematic way to name our nodes. I feel that NYC Wireless has done a good job with this, with the nodes listed by borough. --BillHolmstrom
I agree, oddly enough, i did this sometime yesterday for my ashland nodes and was thinking the exact same thing. --ForrestEnglish
Since the node map database already has a field for group affiliation (PTP, NYC, BAWUG, etc), and groups are generally local/regional in scope, each group should determine how to list locations within their "territory." In New York, they categorize by borough first, then generally by street location. For Portland, I suggest using N, NE, NW, SW, SE for the closer-in areas, and community names (Vancouver, Gresham, etc.) for outer areas. After that, areas with thin node populations can list the node name, while thickly populated areas may need sub-areas before the node name. I believe we should avoid using street addresses in the node name. Examples:
- SW: Downtown: Pioneer Courthouse Square
- SE: Inner: Lucky Lab
- NW: Old Town: Union Station
- Vancouver: Esther Short Park

