|
← Revision 1 as of 2007-08-23 07:47:42 →
Size: 1064
Comment:
|
Size: 1210
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 1: | Line 1: |
|
[[Navigation(siblings)]] [[Anchor(Illinois)]] |
<<Navigation(siblings)>> <<Anchor(Illinois)>> |
| Line 4: | Line 4: |
| [#Illinois [link]] | [[#Illinois|[link]]] |
| Line 6: | Line 6: |
| * [http://www.wifinetnews.com/archives/007525.html MetroFi changes business model?] | * [[http://www.wifinetnews.com/archives/007525.html|MetroFi changes business model?]] |
| Line 8: | Line 8: |
| * [http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/beaconnews/news/318576,2_1_AU29_WIFI_S1.article Free Wi-Fi plans pulled in Tri-Cities] | * [[http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/beaconnews/news/318576,2_1_AU29_WIFI_S1.article|Free Wi-Fi plans pulled in Tri-Cities]] |
| Line 10: | Line 10: |
| * [[http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/beaconnews/news/539094,2_1_AU02_WIFI_S1.article|City disappointed in pace of Wi-Fi network setup]] |
| /Anchorage /Concord /Corona /Illinois /Lompoc /Ontario /Portland /Riverside /SanJose /SantaClara /Sunnyvale /Toledo |
Batavia, Geneva, and St. Charles, Illinois
Links
MetroFi changes business model?
"MetroFi is now requiring that cities in which it provides free, ad-supported Wi-Fi access to residents and visitors agree to a minimum service buy as part of the contract, van Haaften said. The firm previously had language in the contract that expressed more of a statement of intent that cities would buy wireless services, but didn’t require them. “We’re making that a stronger part of our RFP requirement,” van Haaften said. “We still build the network for free, but there is a requirement that there is a certain amount of services bought by from us by city departments.”"
Free Wi-Fi plans pulled in Tri-Cities
"Business model change: Batavia, Geneva, St. Charles cannot get same Internet service offered by MetroFi in Aurora"