Differences between revisions 10 and 16 (spanning 6 versions)
Revision 10 as of 2002-05-22 23:38:31
Size: 3791
Editor: cs6625184-203
Comment:
Revision 16 as of 2002-05-22 23:44:14
Size: 4140
Editor: cs6625184-203
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 31: Line 31:
 *[http://www.cc.saga-u.ac.jp/opengate/index-e.html Opengate] developed at
  Saga University, GPLed, runs on FreeBSD. Uses a Java applet to keep the
 
connection open, and ftp or pop3 servers for an authentication back-end.
 
(added by Jim Thompson)
 *[http://www.cc.saga-u.ac.jp/opengate/index-e.html Opengate] developed at Saga University (Japan)
   * GPLed, runs on FreeBSD. Uses a Java applet to keep the connection open, and ftp or pop3 servers for an authentication back-end. (added by Jim Thompson)
Line 45: Line 43:
  * Yeah, its Cisco's Service Selection Gateway -- Jim Thompson
Line 48: Line 47:
  * Not quite true. The Starbucks deal was Mobilestar, and there was precious little Microsoft content in the deal (or company). --Jim Thompson
Line 54: Line 54:
  *[http://www.wayport.net Wayport]
    * Another solution using Linux, perl IPF, and Apache. No source available --Jim Thompson

Since we first started talking about using the browser as an authentication tool in December 2000 OpenSource implementations have started to appear. Here is a list of all the software I know of that implements either a CaptivePortal or an ActivePortal solution.

Open Source

Commercial or Proprietary


[CategorySoftware]

PortalSoftware (last edited 2013-08-02 12:18:46 by cable-89-216-24-221)