Differences between revisions 3 and 8 (spanning 5 versions)
Revision 3 as of 2002-03-22 13:12:13
Size: 2678
Editor: rauxpo
Comment:
Revision 8 as of 2002-05-22 23:35:41
Size: 3748
Editor: cs6625184-203
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 7: Line 7:

 * MetaNet by ErikWalthinsen. Still in early beta but it will provide an entire network application framework rather then just a CaptivePortal solution.
Line 23: Line 25:
 * [http://software.stockholmopen.net/index.shtml StockholmOpen] by the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, Sweden
  * This system is also operator neutral, allowing different users to connect through the access network to different upstream providers. Implementation in C, uses PAM, Linux/FreeBSD. BSD License. (Added by MartinHedenfalk).

 *[http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=authpf&sektion=8]
  *A shell in openbsd (added in 3.1) which can change filter and translation rules for a source IP. I haven't tried it yet. (Added by LimAko).

 *[http://www.cc.saga-u.ac.jp/opengate/index-e.html / Opengate] developed at
  Saga University, GPLed, runs on FreeBSD. Uses a Java applet to keep the
  connection open, and ftp or pop3 servers for an authentication back-end.
  (added by Jim Thompson)
Line 24: Line 37:

 * Aptilo's Captive Portal
  * http://www.aptilo.com/pages/main/solution/mobile.htm

Since we first started talking about using the browser as an authentication tool in December 2000 OpenSource implementations have started to appear. Here is a list of all the software I know of that implements either a CaptivePortal or an ActivePortal solution.

Open Source

Commercial or Proprietary


[CategorySoftware]

PortalSoftware (last edited 2013-08-02 12:18:46 by cable-89-216-24-221)