Differences between revisions 1 and 3 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2002-08-19 02:31:52
Size: 467
Editor: pw
Comment:
Revision 3 as of 2002-08-26 01:54:38
Size: 482
Editor: node006-135
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
However there is a real problem. There are only two browsers which support full CSS functionality. [http://www.mozilla.org/ Mozilla] and Internet Explorer for the Macintosh. [http://www.opera.com/ Opera] and Konqueror are better then Internet Explorer for Windows but still have their own quirks, at least with our new web site. However there is a real problem: there are only two browsers which support full CSS functionality. [http://www.mozilla.org/ Mozilla] and Internet Explorer for the Macintosh. [http://www.opera.com/ Opera] and Konqueror are better than Internet Explorer for Windows but still have their own quirks, at least with our new web site.
Line 7: Line 7:
IS this real?

When you have the best thing going it's always nice to make snide comments about everyone else. :-)

However there is a real problem: there are only two browsers which support full CSS functionality. [http://www.mozilla.org/ Mozilla] and Internet Explorer for the Macintosh. [http://www.opera.com/ Opera] and Konqueror are better than Internet Explorer for Windows but still have their own quirks, at least with our new web site.


[CategoryPropaganda] IS this real?

RealBrowser (last edited 2012-03-10 19:19:47 by DanRasmussen)