Differences between revisions 31 and 32
Revision 31 as of 2003-01-06 23:22:35
Size: 4312
Editor: anonymous
Comment: missing edit-log entry for this revision
Revision 32 as of 2003-01-17 15:19:20
Size: 5014
Editor: dynamic-147-154
Comment: How did NoCatAuth not make it on to this page to begin with? :-)
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 4: Line 4:

 * [http://nocat.net/download/NoCatAuth/ NoCatAuth] -- Written in perl, supports Linux/iptables and OpenBSD/pfctl. GPLed. Supports authenticating modes against an auth service with a wide variety of backends, including a MySQL database, PAM, RADIUS, LDAP, and more. Also features a non-authenticating "open mode" that merely requires a user to accept an AUP before they can log in. This project is more or less seeking a new maintainer.
 
 * [http://nocat.net/download/NoCatSplash/ NoCatSplash] -- Written in C, currently under heavy development. Intended to be the successor to NoCatAuth, the gateway process and all its data files fit within 200-250k, making it ideal for embedded environments.

Since we first started talking about using the browser as an authentication tool in December 2000 OpenSource implementations have started to appear. Here is a list of all the software I know of that implements either a CaptivePortal or an ActivePortal solution.

Open Source

Commercial or Proprietary

-- Suresh Rasaretnam

  • [http://www.controlap.com ControlAP] Win*,*nix,MacOS, Zaurus,PocketPC No source available, basic version free. Currently in beta.


[CategorySoftware]

PortalSoftware (last edited 2013-08-02 12:18:46 by cable-89-216-24-221)