Differences between revisions 38 and 40 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 38 as of 2003-08-24 21:20:44
Size: 5501
Editor: dsl081-060-155
Comment:
Revision 40 as of 2003-08-26 00:23:39
Size: 5585
Editor: adsl-67-116-62-155
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 9: Line 9:
  *Written in C, currently under heavy development. Intended to be the successor to NoCatAuth, the gateway process and all its data files fit within 200-250k, making it ideal for embedded environments.   * Written in C, currently under heavy development. Intended to be the successor to NoCatAuth, the gateway process and all its data files fit within 200-250k, making it ideal for embedded environments.
Line 11: Line 11:
 *[http://www.cc.saga-u.ac.jp/opengate/index-e.html Opengate developed at Saga University (Japan)]
  *GPLed, runs on FreeBSD. Uses a Java applet to keep the connection open, and ftp or pop3 servers for an authentication back-end. (added by Jim Thompson)
 * [http://www.cc.saga-u.ac.jp/opengate/index-e.html Opengate developed at Saga University (Japan)]
  * GPLed, runs on FreeBSD. Uses a Java applet to keep the connection open, and ftp or pop3 servers for an authentication back-end. (added by Jim Thompson)
Line 15: Line 15:
  *Still in early beta but it will provide an entire network application framework rather then just a CaptivePortal solution.   * Still in early beta but it will provide an entire network application framework rather then just a CaptivePortal solution.
Line 17: Line 17:
 *[http://www.geekspeed.net/wicap/ WiCap] by BrianCaswell  * [http://www.geekspeed.net/wicap/ WiCap] by BrianCaswell
Line 32: Line 32:
 * [http://www.itlab.musc.edu/~nathan/authentication_gateway/] by Nathan Zorn  * [http://www.itlab.musc.edu/~nathan/authentication_gateway/ Authentication Gateway HOWTO] by Nathan Zorn
Line 38: Line 38:
 * [http://www.myzona.net/opensplash OpenSplash] by Aleksandr Melentiev from San Francisco Wireless
  * Inspired by the simplicity of wicap, intended to run on FreeBSD by utilizing Perl and ipfw. Doesn't provide much functionality, other than a simple AUP agreement.
 * [http://opensplash.qalab.com OpenSplash] by Aleksandr Melentiev from San Francisco Wireless
  * Inspired by the simplicity of wicap, intended to run on FreeBSD by utilizing Perl and ipfw. Doesn't provide much functionality, other than a simple AUP agreement. Development is in progress to expand its capabilities.

Since we first started talking about using the browser as an authentication tool in December 2000 OpenSource implementations have started to appear. Here is a list of all the software I know of that implements either a CaptivePortal or an ActivePortal solution.

Open Source

Commercial or Proprietary


[CategorySoftware]

PortalSoftware (last edited 2013-08-02 12:18:46 by cable-89-216-24-221)