Differences between revisions 38 and 41 (spanning 3 versions)
Revision 38 as of 2003-08-24 21:20:44
Size: 5501
Editor: dsl081-060-155
Comment:
Revision 41 as of 2003-08-31 09:05:28
Size: 5728
Editor: c-67-161-156-224
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 9: Line 9:
  *Written in C, currently under heavy development. Intended to be the successor to NoCatAuth, the gateway process and all its data files fit within 200-250k, making it ideal for embedded environments.   * Written in C, currently under heavy development. Intended to be the successor to NoCatAuth, the gateway process and all its data files fit within 200-250k, making it ideal for embedded environments.
Line 11: Line 11:
 *[http://www.cc.saga-u.ac.jp/opengate/index-e.html Opengate developed at Saga University (Japan)]
  *GPLed, runs on FreeBSD. Uses a Java applet to keep the connection open, and ftp or pop3 servers for an authentication back-end. (added by Jim Thompson)
 * [http://www.cc.saga-u.ac.jp/opengate/index-e.html Opengate developed at Saga University (Japan)]
  * GPLed, runs on FreeBSD. Uses a Java applet to keep the connection open, and ftp or pop3 servers for an authentication back-end. (added by Jim Thompson)
Line 15: Line 15:
  *Still in early beta but it will provide an entire network application framework rather then just a CaptivePortal solution.   * Still in early beta but it will provide an entire network application framework rather then just a CaptivePortal solution.
Line 17: Line 17:
 *[http://www.geekspeed.net/wicap/ WiCap] by BrianCaswell  * [http://www.geekspeed.net/wicap/ WiCap] by BrianCaswell
Line 32: Line 32:
 * [http://www.itlab.musc.edu/~nathan/authentication_gateway/] by Nathan Zorn  * [http://www.itlab.musc.edu/~nathan/authentication_gateway/ Authentication Gateway HOWTO] by Nathan Zorn
Line 38: Line 38:
 * [http://www.myzona.net/opensplash OpenSplash] by Aleksandr Melentiev from San Francisco Wireless
  * Inspired by the simplicity of wicap, intended to run on FreeBSD by utilizing Perl and ipfw. Doesn't provide much functionality, other than a simple AUP agreement.
 * [http://opensplash.qalab.com OpenSplash] by Aleksandr Melentiev from San Francisco Wireless
  * Inspired by the simplicity of wicap, intended to run on FreeBSD by utilizing Perl and ipfw. Doesn't provide much functionality, other than a simple AUP agreement. Development is in progress to expand its capabilities.
Line 78: Line 78:
 * [http://www.controlap.com ControlAP] Win*,*nix,MacOS, Zaurus,PocketPC No source available, basic version free. Currently in beta.  * [http://www.controlap.com ControlAP] Win*,*nix,MacOS, Zaurus,PocketPC No source available, basic version free. Currently out of beta.

 * [http://www.patronsoft.com PatronSoft], Win*, requires SQL server 2000 or similar, you can beg for a free lic. if you are non-profit

Since we first started talking about using the browser as an authentication tool in December 2000 OpenSource implementations have started to appear. Here is a list of all the software I know of that implements either a CaptivePortal or an ActivePortal solution.

Open Source

Commercial or Proprietary


[CategorySoftware]

PortalSoftware (last edited 2013-08-02 12:18:46 by cable-89-216-24-221)