Differences between revisions 1 and 9 (spanning 8 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2021-03-15 20:29:34
Size: 1070
Comment: add initial agenda, add your item too! it is fun for you and it's fun for me.
Revision 9 as of 2021-03-17 16:38:11
Size: 2222
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 4: Line 4:
'''Roll Call:''' Them<<BR>> '''Roll Call:''' RussellSenior,TomasKuchta,JasonBergstrom<<BR>>
Line 9: Line 9:
 * Lost contact with magenta in Stephouse closet ... sometime in the last month or two.
Line 10: Line 11:
  * NodeFreeFunk -- back online and reflashed
  * [[NodeLuckyLabNW]] -- reflashed, but didn't come back online by itself (details below);
  * NodeBuffaloGap -- ap4, in the front corner room was offline due to a failed power supply, replaced it. Also, got a request to recrimp the end on an ethernet cable going to one of their cameras. --RussellSenior
  * NodeHancock -- back online, host is inquiring about improving the range of his household network (i.e. not the PTP one).
  * NodeFreeFunk -- (an MR24) back online and reflashed
  * [[NodeLuckyLabNW]] -- reflashed, but didn't come back online by itself (details below), fun fact, the DHCP Lease Time from the upstream router is set to 10 years;
Line 20: Line 23:
  * Remaining MR24 gateways not yet reflashed:    * NodeEleven
Line 23: Line 26:
   * NodeEleven
 * Turns out, there are DHCP servers (I am looking at you TrendNet) that violate [[https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2132|RFC2132]] and recent OpenWrt's busybox udhcpc doesn't like that. Russell created a patch that works around the problem, submitted upstream to busybox and openwrt.
 * Turns out, there are DHCP servers (I am looking at you TrendNet) that violate [[https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2132|RFC2132]] and recent OpenWrt's busybox udhcpc doesn't like that. Russell created a [[http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2021-March/088619.html|patch]] that works around the problem, submitted upstream to busybox and openwrt.
 * City of Portland apparently has $217 million from Section 602 of the [[https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1319/text|American Recovery Act of 2021]], see in particular 602(c)(1)(D), which says a valid USE OF FUNDS is "to make necessary investments in water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure". It is possible Multnomah County also has funds allocated, though I haven't heard that directly.
 * Congressman Clyburn has proposed a bill spending $90+ billion on broadband [[https://www.majoritywhip.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/SxS-for-AAIA-.pdf|HR1783]]

Location: Jitsi
Date and Time: Wednesday, March 17, 2021, 5:30pm-8:00pm
Scribe: You
Roll Call: RussellSenior,TomasKuchta,JasonBergstrom

Agenda

  • Pick location for next weekly
  • Lost contact with magenta in Stephouse closet ... sometime in the last month or two.
  • Node notes:
  • Turns out, there are DHCP servers (I am looking at you TrendNet) that violate RFC2132 and recent OpenWrt's busybox udhcpc doesn't like that. Russell created a patch that works around the problem, submitted upstream to busybox and openwrt.

  • City of Portland apparently has $217 million from Section 602 of the American Recovery Act of 2021, see in particular 602(c)(1)(D), which says a valid USE OF FUNDS is "to make necessary investments in water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure". It is possible Multnomah County also has funds allocated, though I haven't heard that directly.

  • Congressman Clyburn has proposed a bill spending $90+ billion on broadband HR1783

  • Your Item Here

Notes

  • None Yet


[CategoryMeetingNotes]

WeeklyMeeting20210317 (last edited 2021-03-17 19:11:14 by JasonBergstrom)