Differences between revisions 3 and 7 (spanning 4 versions)
Revision 3 as of 2021-03-16 11:37:44
Size: 1725
Comment: add a couple federal things
Revision 7 as of 2021-03-17 15:53:47
Size: 2097
Comment: linked to the patch
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 10: Line 10:
  * NodeBuffaloGap -- ap4, in the front corner room was offline due to a failed power supply, replaced it. --RussellSenior
  * NodeFreeFunk -- back online and reflashed
  * [[NodeLuckyLabNW]] -- reflashed, but didn't come back online by itself (details below);
  * NodeBuffaloGap -- ap4, in the front corner room was offline due to a failed power supply, replaced it. Also, got a request to recrimp the end on an ethernet cable going to one of their cameras. --RussellSenior
  * NodeHancock -- back online, host is inquiring about improving the range of his household network (i.e. not the PTP one).
  * Node
FreeFunk -- (an MR24) back online and reflashed
  * [[NodeLuckyLabNW]] -- reflashed, but didn't come back online by itself (details below), fun fact, the DHCP Lease Time from the upstream router is set to 10 years;
Line 24: Line 25:
 * Turns out, there are DHCP servers (I am looking at you TrendNet) that violate [[https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2132|RFC2132]] and recent OpenWrt's busybox udhcpc doesn't like that. Russell created a patch that works around the problem, submitted upstream to busybox and openwrt.  * Turns out, there are DHCP servers (I am looking at you TrendNet) that violate [[https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2132|RFC2132]] and recent OpenWrt's busybox udhcpc doesn't like that. Russell created a [[http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2021-March/088619.html|patch]] that works around the problem, submitted upstream to busybox and openwrt.

Location: Jitsi
Date and Time: Wednesday, March 17, 2021, 5:30pm-8:00pm
Scribe: You
Roll Call: Them

Agenda

  • Pick location for next weekly
  • Node notes:
  • Turns out, there are DHCP servers (I am looking at you TrendNet) that violate RFC2132 and recent OpenWrt's busybox udhcpc doesn't like that. Russell created a patch that works around the problem, submitted upstream to busybox and openwrt.

  • City of Portland apparently has $217 million from Section 602 of the American Recovery Act of 2021, see in particular 602(c)(1)(D), which says a valid USE OF FUNDS is "to make necessary investments in water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure". It is possible Multnomah County also has funds allocated, though I haven't heard that directly.

  • Congressman Clyburn has proposed a bill spending $90+ billion on broadband HR1783

  • Your Item Here

Notes

  • None Yet


[CategoryMeetingNotes]

WeeklyMeeting20210317 (last edited 2021-03-17 19:11:14 by JasonBergstrom)